What the PSP did right – and wrong

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

With Sony’s announcement of the PlayStation Vita, the days of the PlayStation Portable are coming to a close. The PSP is the most successful non-Nintendo handheld video game system to date. It did some things right, and some things wrong.

Like a lot of people, I was first attracted to the PSP at an aesthetic level. I saw it at a Gamestop shortly after launch and played Wipeout. It was a beautiful system with a big, gorgeous screen. It was easily the best looking portable system I had ever seen.

After begging my parents to get me one for Christmas, I began to realize they kind of forgot to make games for it. Lumines was a fun, inventive puzzle game, and some of the other launch games like Ape Escape: On the Loose and Twisted Metal: Head On were fun, but nothing special. As time went on, other decent games kept coming out, but there was no killer app.

The problem is that the PSP was almost too powerful. The reason the DS succeeded is that it offered gaming experiences that couldn’t be had anywhere else. The PSP simply offered console-quality games in a portable format. I don’t want to play some big game with cutscenes and voice acting while I’m hunched over a three-inch screen. I want to play that type of game on a television with a controller in one hand and a drink in the other. This isn’t to say games like Daxter and Dissidia weren’t a ton of fun – they were. It’s just that a portable system is not the ideal way to experience games like that.

It didn’t help matters that the PSP was not very portable, despite the word “portable” in the name of the system. The original, fat PSP was a beast. It could not fit in your pocket. This is what prevented me from really enjoying the PSP. Unless I wanted to carry a bag around with me all the time, I couldn’t play it out of the house. Sure, I could play it at home, but what would be the point? I have real video game consoles hooked up to televisions at home.

Sony soon started releasing smaller versions of the PSP, but they were still too big to comfortably take out of the house. Until the PSP Go came along. Yes, I was one of the few people who actually bought a PSP Go. I thought, finally, a PSP that’s actually portable. I understood that buying a Go locked me into Sony’s pricing structure, but I didn’t care. I still had my old PSP in case I wanted to play disc-based games. I was right in that the Go was actually portable and could easily fit into my pocket, but I had overlooked one crucial detail – I still didn’t want to play console-quality games on a handheld system. This problem was intensified thanks to smartphones.

To be fair, neither Sony nor Nintendo had any way of predicting what a huge thing smartphones would be when they released their respective handheld systems back in 2004. But smartphones have forever altered the handheld gaming landscape. Suddenly, carrying around a device to play games on seemed superfluous when you could simply whip out your phone and play Angry Birds or Plants vs. Zombies. Something like Angry Birds is exactly the type of game I want to play when I’m out and about. It’s extremely simple and can be played in short bursts. There’s no voice acting, in-engine cutscenes, orchestral scores, or moral choices. It’s a fun, stupid game that amounts to little more than something to do with your hands for a few minutes.

Sony doesn’t appear to have learned the lessons of the PSP. At E3, they showed Uncharted on a Vita. Uncharted, really? That’s the definition of a game best played on a television. I’ll probably exacerbate the problem by buying a Vita anyway, because I want to play every Uncharted game that exists. But I won’t like playing it on a three-inch screen.

Readers Comments (5)

  1. Splitting Void July 17, 2011 @ 23:18

    I’d take big killer games like Monster Hunter Portable 3rd Dissidia Duodecim and Bleach Heat the Soul 7 over Angry Birds and Plants vs Zombies or Pokemon any day. For me the PSP most often wasn’t the kind of thing I intended use to pass a couple minutes, I personally would play quickie games on a smartphone for that or just listen to music. My fat original PSP did work well being carried in my bag to school or in my cargo pants pockets to pass free time with my friends or when I went on trips or long commutes and felt like relaxing with some quality progressive games rather than quickie games that get repetitive fast. I thought of the PSP more like a portable console and I prefer it to be that way.

  2. i gues i got mine at just the right time
    when resistance r. came
    so the same year i got to enyoy motorstorm ae, gow coo, and others
    than i went digital with the go and 2010 had the fear of my psp exploding on me when playing gost of sparta, and lost ower 200 houres (and counting) on mgs peacewalker
    now that i have mases of digital games on my psp go, there is no reason for me to hesitate on geting vita when it comes out…
    resistance + uncharted + killzone + vita = me geting one

  3. @Jared London

    to me it sounds like you dont need a psp, but are still getting one just because
    unlike many people including myself you may not be traveling for 4 houres back and fourt on a train ewery week
    when you do that, you realise that unfortunatly puzle games and arcades dont last that long
    smart phones and the ds are ofering simple quick games for one public
    and the psp is ofering console quality games for the other public
    dont fink the entire market is gona suit youre needs
    if it did, than you would be the only one playing a portable console

    also try to ceep a solid thick line betwen opinions and facts in youre next article, looking forward to it.

  4. Jared London July 18, 2011 @ 08:58

    I get what you guys are saying. If I had to take frequent long train rides, I might think differently. But the main point is that I don’t want to play big console-quality gamed on a three inch screen.

    I could get behind some kind of a process for the Vita where you could buy a game for PS3, get a code to play it on the Vita for free or very cheap, and transfer the save data in between. (Like the PS1 classics). I just don’t like having these big games come out for PSP, and be forced to play them in a way that hurts my neck.

  5. @Jared London
    you dont have to, thats the beauty of todays market
    you hawe lots of platforms doing loots of difrent games
    if you dont beliewe youre ready or have time to play a console quality game on the bus or on a 5 inch screen(13cm), than get some psp minis, or get a 3ds, ds lite…, its not like sony is holding a gun to youre head teling you to buy a vita, or are they?

Comments are closed.